My original intention was to deepen my understanding of people, place and identity beyond the halted public art plan at Springfield Brewery. Using this as a platform, my aim was to further my understanding of the concept of ‘taskscape’ – or an array of related tasks (just as landscape is an array of related features) at the site; past and present. This, I felt, would help me understand how places can move from a past period of industrial and residential activity to what the area is becoming now and how, as an artist, I could place myself within that.

This had a lot to do with the sense of ‘pride’ once associated with the Brewery as a beacon in the area, both physically and psychologically.

I also aimed to explore how I could place myself in that space of change, or how I could create a space similar to what Rosalind Deutche suggests “….. space, in the sense of ‘something that has been made room for’ can of course be a city, building or park, but it can also be, say, a category, a theory, an identity, a discipline, a work of art or a conference”. Initially I hoped I could feed into the possible future of the Brewery and immediate area and build relationships with local newspapers to begin to build that space.

This project has evolved as I have felt my way through it. I underestimated many things; struggling with a mechanism with which to engage with the local community and receiving little response with the newspaper contact I had. However, I maintained research into the area, its industrial history and how people used to activate those spaces, and this began to encompass a wider area, encompassing the canal corridor. I was also interested in what was being lost physically as well as psychologically or how the language of Wolverhampton is changing.

This study also made me aware of the other major developments in the area, such as the Interchange development encompassing the train and bus station and new student accommodation buildings. This was something that I felt I needed to be involved in so the research took a new direction.

I began to contact the Development Control department at the council, amongst other parties, to understand how these developments were progressing and discover the opportunities for artists to be involved. It was simply about starting conversations and copying others into them, such as: Wolverhampton Development Company, the previous writer for the percent for art policy, council landscape architects and project managers.

I created a blog due to the lack of contact at the newspaper to begin to bring my thoughts, investigations and meetings (with such people as a council archaeologist and neighbourhood co-ordinator) together as a reference point. Suddenly this became a possible way of whispering a demonstration of my thinking to those parties involved in these developments. I also began to see that the ideas and suggestions I was putting forward to others was the kind of space (albeit a very small embryonic one) that Rosalind Deutche was talking about, as this was both creating a ‘space’ and intervening or ‘disturbing’ things, as Nabeel Hamdi would describe it.

My emails and suggestions have been met with agreement but of course there is always difficulty in finding a way forward. Making things happen or play out differently so that artists are involved at an early stage in development in Wolverhampton is problematic as some developments and designs are in latter stages. I am, though, enthused by the sentiments of planners for the future.

I realised I was triangulating three sources: planning (development) procedures; research into past identity / taskscape; and research into present identity / taskscape.

Contact and relationships with the community have been slow; it has taken a while to design appropriate resources and deploy them and find an acceptable approach to begin to build a relationship. I’ve recently had conversations with young people in the area and am receiving news that others are interested in contributing.

This journey is fulfilling the original intentions but in a way I never expected it to.

I’ve realised that, throughout the action research, what I’ve actually been doing is understanding ‘development’ and what this means and could mean. I want to bring those intentional changes or what we call development into the same arena as those unintentional ones – or the everyday intelligence that is abundant in the area. I think it is here where perhaps artist involvement can move backwards to move forward, connecting and unifying things to aid in joining up approaches and contributions.

I believe in these uncertain times that perhaps Wolverhampton has the opportunity to do this, where it can begin to consciously strengthen those existing links of neighbourhoods, culture, art and regeneration in to a tighter array of related tasks that constitute the term ‘development’. Perhaps then we can escape those pitfalls and disappointments where all these working parts simply don’t add up to much. Where ‘new’ doesn’t necessarily mean ‘change’. Where objects in the landscape become doomed until they enter the acceptance of apathy or a fondness of familiarity. If public art is outside of things as it currently is in Wolverhampton, it too, fails.

My conclusion is to create a more formalised space, beginning with a web space in which to put these thoughts, attitudes and practices together. In effect, developing onwards from the blog into something more sophisticated and interactive. One of the main challenges is to overcome differences in language – between planners, architects, artists and community residents and so on. However, I don’t believe it is about speaking in another’s language; just simply understanding, finding common ground and utilising these tensions. This interactive web site can be accessed by all parties, where new build schemes interweave with community activities, archaeology and other events. What is important here is that this space is boundless; other cultural activities can operate within this and be connected to it. Events such as ‘Guerrilla Lighting’ can fit into this sphere to successfully question the urban environment whilst being outside of the dominant process of development and contributing to it in the future. This type of activity is something that all parties can be involved in and educated by, merging those language barriers and disturbing things.

In this space there can be an acceptance of complexity and connection that can benefit the city’s knowledge of itself and provoke further investment through an input and understanding of place, change and identity. Perhaps Longhouse can come into this by putting artists in this arena to act as a catalyst in building a foundation of shared knowledge and activity that disturbs the current dominant mode of thinking of the term ‘development’.

In effect, this is simply reinterpreting the ethos of the Springfield Brewery which developed its own space where a complex fabric of work, everyday life, social activities and the value of the individual helped maintain that particular sense of ‘pride’ and identity in Wolverhampton.

Evaluation

This project has had a great deal of impact on my practice. It has allowed me the time to put a lot into context regarding the realities of development and art and is an initial start in how to tackle these issues. I feel this has helped me begin to elevate my thinking as an artist and how I would perhaps like to be involved in future development issues. I am beginning to understand fully why artists are needed at all levels of development and how there is a considerable amount of acts of generosity involved to make changes from all sides. Being able to make mistakes, to be able to take the time to study things within the wider grain of theoretical texts and to simply fire questions at individuals at all levels has helped me realise how, in future, to aim at smaller changes that may be catalysts in the larger scheme of things.

One of the most important lessons I feel that I have learned is not to aim for engagement mechanisms that display ingenuity in one hit – that this may miss the point and be insular. It is important to build relationships and this may not happen overnight. Hopefully this project will have another phase – that it can be seen as continued involvement that will move on to something else.

I feel that it has been an opportunity to place myself in this situation without a pre-organised project being in place – and therefore I may have opened up more avenues with regard to my practice. I probably wouldn’t have kept pushing for answers and the information necessary or been able to have the time to be able to see how to make connections, where gaps are. What I liked about undertaking this is the fact that there was no pressure to understand something immediately, a case of ‘I don’t understand where to go next – but I will understand’. I had time to analyse and study responses and decide how to be more pragmatic in my replies. I intend to address further the tendency to think too much before ‘doing’ and to embrace serendipity as something that adds to process. I am sure that my methodologies and the spaces in which I will work have changed considerably for the better because of this.

I hope I will find the means for this to hold some momentum in Wolverhampton as I feel now it’s only beginning to come together. Again small changes or suggestions made to others have been readily accepted, so I feel I have made a start, though I originally expected to achieve more by this time. I have to accept that it is difficult to change or ‘join up’ thinking and that it takes patience.

I valued meetings with Longhouse to openly reflect on the project. This helped me to see what was important and how my thinking could change direction accordingly.